In response to the growing scale, complexity, and systemic influence of market infrastructure institutions (MIIs), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has proposed a sweeping reform of their governance structure. Aimed at reinforcing institutional accountability and public-interest orientation, SEBI’s proposal mandates the appointment of two executive directors (EDs) to manage critical verticals, effectively diluting the concentration of power currently held by the Managing Director. The consultation paper, which is open to public feedback until July 15, underscores SEBI's intention to prioritize compliance, investor protection, and systemic stability over commercial considerations.
Strengthening Oversight in Financial Market Infrastructure
SEBI’s latest proposal marks a significant shift in how India’s stock exchanges and depositories—collectively known as market infrastructure institutions (MIIs)—will be governed. With these institutions now playing a central role in capital markets, evidenced by an expanding investor base, heightened trading volumes, and soaring profitability, the regulator believes the time is ripe to recalibrate their internal power dynamics and oversight mechanisms.
Currently, the Managing Director (MD) functions as the primary executive authority, overseeing all operational verticals within MIIs. SEBI’s consultation paper points out that such centralization may lead to conflicts of interest or governance lapses, especially in areas like risk mitigation, regulatory compliance, and investor grievance redressal.
Introduction of Dual Executive Leadership
To address this gap, SEBI has proposed the appointment of two executive directors (EDs), who will be designated as key managerial personnel (KMPs). These EDs will hold autonomous charge over two core verticals: one overseeing "critical operations" and the other responsible for "regulatory, compliance, risk management, and investor grievances."
Unlike conventional reporting structures, these EDs will operate with a degree of parity to the MD and will report directly to the board as well as SEBI. The aim is to create a system of checks and balances that can insulate vital functions from commercial pressures and improve institutional resilience.
This model is inspired by global best practices in financial governance, where leadership is decentralized to prevent operational bottlenecks and ensure greater transparency in mission-critical areas.
Enhanced Role of Key Officers
Beyond the newly proposed executive directors, SEBI also plans to upgrade the roles and responsibilities of several existing KMPs, including the Chief Technology Officer (CTO), Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), Chief Risk Officer (CRO), and Compliance Officer.
This enhancement is seen as vital given the increasing reliance of MIIs on complex technology stacks, growing cyber risks, and expanding regulatory obligations. In the fiscal year alone, these institutions have reported a marked uptick in technology investments—an indication that digital infrastructure is no longer a support function but a foundational component of market operations.
Tightening Norms on External Engagements
SEBI’s governance overhaul also includes provisions to limit the external directorships held by MDs and EDs. Under the proposed rules, an MD may serve as a non-executive director only on the board of a Section 8 (not-for-profit) company or an unlisted government body that is not commercially active.
Executive directors, on the other hand, will be prohibited from holding directorships in any entity outside their own MII’s subsidiaries. This move is intended to reduce conflicts of interest and ensure that senior leadership remains focused on their core responsibilities within the institution.
Public Interest Takes Center Stage
The broader rationale behind these reforms lies in SEBI’s recognition that MIIs are no longer mere facilitators of trade—they are now systemic utilities with public-interest obligations. The increase in demat account registrations, swelling profits, and the upward trend in dividend payouts all signal that these entities are becoming powerful market actors.
In such a landscape, it becomes imperative to reinforce the primacy of investor protection, compliance, and long-term market integrity over short-term profitability. SEBI’s proposals aim to realign MII governance with these evolving expectations.
Next Steps and Industry Consultation
SEBI has invited public comments on the consultation paper until July 15, 2025. Following the feedback window, the regulator is expected to amend the Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Stock Exchanges and Clearing Corporations) Regulations, 2018 (SECC Regulations) and the Depositories and Participants Regulations, 2018 (D&P Regulations) to formally incorporate the proposed governance framework.
If adopted, the reforms could mark a defining shift in India’s capital market infrastructure—one that better balances commercial success with systemic responsibility.
Final Thought:
SEBI’s initiative to democratize executive oversight within MIIs is not just a governance reform—it is a strategic recalibration of the values driving India's financial architecture. At a time when trust, transparency, and technological resilience are under scrutiny, this move signals an intent to future-proof market institutions while anchoring them in principles of public accountability.
Comments